The spec had previously made a distinction between “HTML 5″ (with space) the vocabulary, and “HTML5″ (without space) the syntax. On September 12, 2009, 15:56 CEST, Lachlan Hunt said: Don’t really find it convincing though… in this case we should have really removed any versioning (i.e., “HTML”). Jens, the only thing close to an explanation that I could find so far is “W333! ’s” comment on the WHATWG blog. There’s nothing but consensus, whether here or on Twitter or on Facebook or in the physical world. On September 12, 2009, 13:43 CEST, Jens Oliver Meiert said: Has any plausible explanation been given to date? I wonder what is behind that kind of naming convention. On September 11, 2009, 20:49 CEST, Jens Nedal said: On September 11, 2009, 10:47 CEST, Francesco said: If you have questions or suggestions about what I write, please leave a comment (if available) or a message. Here on I share some of my views and experiences. Other than that, I love trying things, sometimes including philosophy, art, and adventure. I’ve worked as a technical lead for Google, I’m close to the W3C and the WHATWG, and I write and review books for O’Reilly. I’m Jens Oliver Meiert, and I’m an engineering manager and author. Tweet this? (If it changed your life, you delight me with a coffee.) About Me
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |